Peugeot 301 vs Proton Saga: Which Should You Buy in Egypt?

A complete comparison of the ⁦Peugeot 301⁩ VS ⁦Proton Saga⁩ — specs, prices, pros and cons, and live used listings across Egypt.

⁦Peugeot 301⁩ VS ⁦Proton Saga⁩: the verdict

The Peugeot 301 is the overall winner for buyers prioritizing performance, cabin space, and cargo capacity. However, for those on a strict budget or seeking maximum fuel efficiency, the Proton Saga stands out as the more economical choice, offering substantial savings upfront and at the pump.
#1#2
Price Comparison
Starting at245,990 – 274,990 EGP166,900 – 188,900 EGP
Engine & Power
Engine1,587 cc · 4 cyl1,332 cc · 4 – 5 cyl
Horsepower (bhp)115 hp94 – 95 hp
Torque (Nm)150 Nm120 – 121 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 Km/h (sec)12.1 s13 – 14.5 s
Top Speed (Km/h)180 – 188 km/h155 – 160 km/h
Fuel Economy (L/100 Km)6.6 L/100km5.9 – 6.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity50 L40 L
Gears65
TransmissionAutomaticAutomatic / Manual
Drive TypeFront Wheel DriveFront Wheel Drive
Fuel TypePetrolPetrol
Measurements
L×W×H4.4 m × 1.7 m × 1.5 m4.3 m × 1.7 m × 1.5 m
Wheelbase (meters)2.7 m2.5 m
Curb Weight (kg)1,115 kg1,065 – 1,075 kg
Trunk Capacity (liters)506 L413 L
Overview
Body StyleSedanSedan
Seating Capacity5 seats5 seats
Doors4 doors4 doors
Features
Key features
12V SocketABS (Anti-lock Brake System)AirbagsAnti theft alarmAppsAudio Controls on Steering WheelAuto Door LockAutomatic ACAUXBA (Brake Assist)BluetoothCD PlayerCenter Arm RestCentral LockingChrome Plated Radiator GrilleCruise ControlCruise Control Switch on SteeringCupholdersDaytime Running LightsDrive ComputerEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Electric Door MirrorsElectric SunroofFabric SeatsFog Lamp - Front and RearFoldable Rear SeatsFoldable Rear Seats with 60:40 SplitHalogen HeadlampsHigh Mount Stop LampHill AssistImmobilizerISOFIX Child Seat AnchorsKeyless EntryLeather SeatsLeather Steering WheelLED TaillightsManual ACManual Door MirrorsMap Reading LampsMP3Multi-Information DisplayNavigation SystemNumber of SpeakersOdometerParking SensorsPower OutletsPower SteeringPower Windows - Front and RearRadioRear AC VentsRear CameraRear Window DefoggerSeat Adjustment - ManualSeatbelt pretensionerSemi-LED TaillightsSteering Tilt AdjustmentTemperature DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen SizeTrip ComputerTrip MeterTyre Pressure Monitoring DisplayUSB PortVanity MirrorVehicle Stability Control (VSC)Welcome LightWheel SizeWheels - Alloy
360-Degree Camera360-Degree CameraABS (Anti-lock Brake System)Acoustic HoodActive SteeringAirbagsAluminum WheelsAnti theft alarmAUXBA (Brake Assist)BluetoothCentral LockingChrome Door HandlesChrome Exhaust PipesClimate ControlCollision DetectionDoor Mirrors with Side Turn SignalEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Fabric SeatsFire ExtinguisherFirst Aid KitFog Lamp - Front and RearFoldable Rear Seats with 60:40 SplitFront BrakesGas Shock AbsorberHDMIImmobilizerISOFIX Child Seat AnchorsKeyless EntryLED Fog LightsMP3Multi-Information DisplayOBD (On-board Diagnostics)Off-Road DampersParking SensorsPedestrian airbagPower SteeringPower TailgateRadioSingle Exhaust TipSteering Tilt AdjustmentTraction ControlTyre Pressure Monitoring DisplayUrethane Steering WheelUSB PortVariable Cylinder Management (VCM)Wheel SizeWheels - AlloyWinchWireless Headphones

Which one should you buy?

1

Best for Budget-Conscious Buyers

The Proton Saga is the undisputed champion for value, with a starting price significantly lower than the Peugeot 301, making it highly accessible for first-time buyers or those with tighter budgets.

2

Best for Performance and Driving Dynamics

The Peugeot 301 offers a more engaging driving experience with its 115 hp 1.6L engine, quicker 12.1-second acceleration, and higher top speed, making it better suited for varied driving conditions.

3

Best for Cargo Space

Families or individuals needing ample storage will find the Peugeot 301 superior, boasting a generous 506 liters of trunk capacity compared to the Proton Saga's 413 liters.

4

Best for Fuel Efficiency

For daily commutes and reduced running costs, the Proton Saga takes the lead with an impressive fuel economy as low as 5.9 L/100km, outperforming the Peugeot 301's 6.6 L/100km.

Pros & cons

Peugeot 301

Pros

  • More powerful 115 hp engine
  • Larger 506 L trunk capacity
  • Faster 12.1s acceleration
  • Longer 2.7 m wheelbase for improved passenger space
  • Higher top speed of 188 km/h

Cons

  • Higher starting price point
  • Slightly less fuel-efficient (6.6 L/100km)
  • No manual transmission option

Proton Saga

Pros

  • Significantly lower starting price (from 166,900 EGP)
  • Superior fuel economy (as low as 5.9 L/100km)
  • Option for manual transmission
  • More compact for city maneuverability

Cons

  • Less powerful 95 hp engine
  • Smaller 413 L trunk capacity
  • Slower acceleration (13s)
  • Shorter wheelbase affecting rear passenger comfort

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more affordable, the Peugeot 301 or Proton Saga?

The Proton Saga is significantly more affordable, with prices starting from 166,900 EGP, while the Peugeot 301 starts from 245,990 EGP. If budget is your primary concern, the Proton Saga offers a much lower entry point into the sedan segment in Egypt.

Which car offers better performance, the Peugeot 301 or Proton Saga?

The Peugeot 301 provides superior performance, featuring a 115 hp 1.6L engine compared to the Proton Saga's 95 hp 1.3L engine. It also boasts quicker acceleration at 12.1 seconds and a higher top speed, making it the better choice for those seeking more power.

Is the Peugeot 301 or Proton Saga more fuel-efficient?

The Proton Saga is more fuel-efficient, achieving as low as 5.9 L/100km, whereas the Peugeot 301 has a fuel economy of 6.6 L/100km. For drivers prioritizing lower running costs and fewer trips to the pump, the Proton Saga is the more economical option.

Which car has more trunk space, the Peugeot 301 or Proton Saga?

The Peugeot 301 offers considerably more trunk space with 506 liters, compared to the Proton Saga's 413 liters. For families or individuals who frequently carry large items or luggage, the Peugeot 301 provides a significant advantage in cargo capacity.