
- Home
- Tools
- Compare cars
- Kia Pegas VS Renault Sandero
Kia Pegas vs Renault Sandero: Which Should You Buy in Egypt?
A complete comparison of the Kia Pegas VS Renault Sandero — specs, prices, pros and cons, and live used listings across Egypt.


Renault Sandero
From EGP 615,000
Kia Pegas VS Renault Sandero: the verdict
| #1 Kia Pegas#1 | #2 Renault Sandero#2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price Comparison | ||
| Starting at | — | 615,000 EGP |
| Engine & Power | ||
| Engine | 1,400 cc · 4 cyl | 1,600 cc · 4 cyl |
| Horsepower (bhp) | 95 hp | 110 hp |
| Torque (Nm) | 132 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Acceleration 0-100 Km/h (sec) | 12.2 s | 11.1 s |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | 170 km/h | 161 km/h |
| Fuel Economy (L/100 Km) | 6.1 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 50 L |
| Gears | 4 | 6 |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drive Type | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Measurements | ||
| L×W×H | 4.3 m × 1.7 m × 1.5 m | 4,058 m × 1,994 m × 1,518 m |
| Wheelbase (meters) | 2.6 m | 2,590 m |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1,060 – 1,140 kg | 1,070 kg |
| Trunk Capacity (liters) | 475 L | 320 L |
| Overview | ||
| Body Style | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Features | ||
| Key features | 360-Degree Camera360-Degree CameraABS (Anti-lock Brake System)Acoustic HoodActive SteeringAlloy PedalsAnti theft alarmAnti-theft Wheel BoltsAuto Door LockAUXBluetoothBody Colored GrilleCD PlayerChrome Door HandlesChrome Exhaust PipesClimate ControlCollision DetectionEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Fire ExtinguisherFirst Aid KitGas Shock AbsorberHDMIImmobilizerLED Fog LightsLegroomMP3MudguardMulti-Information DisplayNight VisionOBD (On-board Diagnostics)Off-Road DampersParking SensorsPedestrian airbagPower SeatsPower SteeringPower WindowsPower Windows - Front and RearRacing Or Bucket SeatsRadioRear AC ControlsRear Audio ControlsRear CameraRear Lcd screensSpeed Sensitive Windshield WipersSpoilerTiptronic GearsVariable Cylinder Management (VCM)WinchWireless HeadphonesWood Trim | 12V SocketABS (Anti-lock Brake System)Acoustic HoodActive BonnetActive SteeringAirbagsAUXBluetoothBrake CalipersBumper Side StepCD PlayerCentral LockingChrome Exhaust PipesCollision DetectionCupholdersDigital ClockEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Electric Door MirrorsFabric SeatsFire ExtinguisherFoldable Rear SeatsFront BrakesFront Seat ArmrestGas Shock AbsorberHalogen HeadlampsHDMIHID HeadlightsISOFIX Child Seat AnchorsLED Fog LightsMagnesium Paddle ShiftersManual HeadlampsMP3Multi-Information DisplayOBD (On-board Diagnostics)OdometerOff-Road DampersParking SensorsPedestrian airbagPower OutletsPower SteeringPower TailgateRadioRear Lcd screensSeat Adjustment - ManualSeatbeltsSpoilerSteering Tilt AdjustmentTiptronic GearsTraction ControlUrethane Shift KnobUrethane Steering WheelWinchWireless HeadphonesXenon Headlamps |
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance & Modernity
The Renault Sandero wins for its more powerful 1.6L engine, faster acceleration, and modern 6-speed automatic transmission, providing a more engaging drive.
Best for Cargo Capacity
The Kia Pegas is the clear winner for carrying luggage, offering a generous 475 liters of trunk space compared to the Sandero's 320 liters.
Best for Fuel Efficiency & Range
The Renault Sandero offers marginally better fuel economy at 6.0 L/100km and a larger 50L fuel tank, translating to longer distances between refills.
Best for Traditional Sedan Appeal
For buyers who prefer the classic look and separated cargo area of a sedan, the Kia Pegas is the ideal choice over the Sandero's hatchback design.
Pros & cons
Kia Pegas
Pros
- Generous 475L trunk capacity
- Traditional sedan body style
- Higher top speed (170 km/h)
- Slightly longer wheelbase for comfort
Cons
- Less powerful engine (95 hp)
- Slower acceleration (12.2 s)
- Older 4-speed automatic transmission
- Smaller fuel tank (43 L)
Renault Sandero
Pros
- More powerful 1.6L engine (110 hp)
- Quicker acceleration (11.1 s)
- Modern 6-speed automatic transmission
- Slightly better fuel economy (6.0 L/100km)
- Larger fuel tank (50 L)
Cons
- Smaller trunk capacity (320 L)
- Hatchback body style might not appeal to all
- Lower top speed (161 km/h)
- Wider body might be less nimble in tight spaces




