
- Home
- Tools
- Compare cars
- Chevrolet Optra VS Renault Logan
Chevrolet Optra vs Renault Logan: Which Should You Buy in Egypt?
A complete comparison of the Chevrolet Optra VS Renault Logan — specs, prices, pros and cons, and live used listings across Egypt.


Renault Logan
From EGP 415,000
Chevrolet Optra VS Renault Logan: the verdict
| #1 Chevrolet Optra#1 | #2 Renault Logan#2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price Comparison | ||
| Starting at | — | 415,000 – 445,000 EGP |
| Engine & Power | ||
| Engine | 1,485 cc · 4 cyl | 1,600 cc · 4 cyl |
| Horsepower (bhp) | 110 hp | 110 hp |
| Torque (Nm) | 146 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Acceleration 0-100 Km/h (sec) | 13.2 s | 11.4 – 12.4 s |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | 170 km/h | 175 – 190 km/h |
| Fuel Economy (L/100 Km) | 7.3 L/100km | 5.8 – 7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 – 55 L |
| Gears | 6 | 4 |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drive Type | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Measurements | ||
| L×W×H | 4.6 m × 1.7 m × 1.5 m | 4.4 m × 1.7 m × 1.5 m |
| Wheelbase (meters) | 2.6 m | 2.6 m |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1,220 kg | 1,050 – 1,360 kg |
| Trunk Capacity (liters) | 405 L | 510 L |
| Overview | ||
| Body Style | Sedan | Sedan |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Features | ||
| Key features | 12V SocketABS (Anti-lock Brake System)AirbagsAnti theft alarmAudio Controls on Steering WheelAUXBA (Brake Assist)CD PlayerCenter Arm RestCentral LockingCupholdersEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Electric Door MirrorsElectric SunroofFog Lamp - Front and RearFoldable Rear Seats with 60:40 SplitFront Seat ArmrestHalogen HeadlampsHigh Mount Stop LampImmobilizerISOFIX Child Seat AnchorsKeyless EntryLeather SeatsManual ACNumber of SpeakersOdometerParking SensorsPower SteeringPower Windows - Front and RearRadioRear CupholdersRear Window DefoggerSeat Adjustment - ManualTrip ComputerUrethane Steering WheelUSB PortWheel SizeWheels - Alloy | 12V SocketABS (Anti-lock Brake System)Acoustic HoodActive BonnetActive HeadrestsActive SteeringAdaptive Suspension PackageAirbagsAluminum WheelsAUXBluetoothBody Colored MirrorsBumper Side StepCargo Area LightCenter Arm RestCentral LockingChrome Exhaust PipesCollision DetectionDoor Handles - Body ColoredDrive ComputerEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Electric Door MirrorsFabric SeatsFire ExtinguisherFog Lamp - Front and RearFoldable Rear SeatsFront BrakesFront Seat ArmrestGas Shock AbsorberHDMIHigh Mount Stop LampKeyless EntryLED Fog LightsLumbar SupportManual ACManual HeadlampsMap Reading LampsMP3Multi-Information DisplayOBD (On-board Diagnostics)OdometerOff-Road DampersPedestrian airbagPower OutletsPower SteeringPower Windows - Front and RearRadioRear BrakesRear Lcd screensSeat Adjustment - ManualSeatbelt pretensionerSingle Exhaust TipSpoilerTiptronic GearsTraction ControlTyre Pressure Monitoring DisplayUrethane Shift KnobVanity MirrorWheels - AlloyWinchWireless Headphones |
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance & Efficiency
With its quicker acceleration (11.4 seconds) and superior fuel economy (5.8 L/100km), the Renault Logan offers a more dynamic and economical driving experience.
Best for Cargo Space
Boasting a generous 510 liters of trunk capacity, the Renault Logan is the clear winner for those needing ample storage for luggage or groceries.
Best for Transmission Refinement
The Chevrolet Optra comes with a 6-speed automatic transmission, potentially offering smoother shifts and better cruising refinement compared to the Logan's 4-speed auto.
Best for Urban Commutes
The Renault Logan's combination of better fuel efficiency and nimble performance makes it an ideal choice for navigating city traffic and daily errands in Egypt.
Pros & cons
Chevrolet Optra
Pros
- 6-speed automatic transmission
- Slightly longer body (4.6m)
- Robust 1.5L engine
Cons
- Slower acceleration (13.2s)
- Lower fuel efficiency (7.3 L/100km)
- Smaller trunk capacity (405 L)
- Lower top speed (170 km/h)
Renault Logan
Pros
- Faster acceleration (11.4s)
- Superior fuel economy (5.8 L/100km)
- Significantly larger trunk (510 L)
- Higher top speed (190 km/h)
- Slightly higher torque (148 Nm)
Cons
- 4-speed automatic transmission
- Shorter overall length (4.4m)









