Chevrolet Optra vs Peugeot 301: Which Should You Buy in Egypt?

A complete comparison of the ⁦Chevrolet Optra⁩ VS ⁦Peugeot 301⁩ — specs, prices, pros and cons, and live used listings across Egypt.

⁦Chevrolet Optra⁩ VS ⁦Peugeot 301⁩: the verdict

The Peugeot 301 emerges as the stronger contender, offering superior fuel efficiency, better performance, and significantly more trunk space, making it a highly practical choice for daily driving in Egypt. While the Chevrolet Optra provides a slightly larger fuel tank, the 301's overall package presents a more modern and refined driving experience for its price point.
#1#2
Price Comparison
Starting at—665,000 – 695,000 EGP
Engine & Power
Engine1,485 cc · 4 cyl1,587 cc · 4 cyl
Horsepower (bhp)110 hp115 hp
Torque (Nm)146 Nm150 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 Km/h (sec)13.2 s12.1 s
Top Speed (Km/h)170 km/h180 – 188 km/h
Fuel Economy (L/100 Km)7.3 L/100km6.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity54 L50 L
Gears66
TransmissionAutomaticAutomatic
Drive TypeFront Wheel DriveFront Wheel Drive
Fuel TypePetrolPetrol
Measurements
L×W×H4.6 m × 1.7 m × 1.5 m4.4 m × 1.7 m × 1.5 m
Wheelbase (meters)2.6 m2.7 m
Curb Weight (kg)1,220 kg1,115 kg
Trunk Capacity (liters)405 L506 L
Overview
Body StyleSedanSedan
Seating Capacity5 seats5 seats
Doors4 doors4 doors
Features
Key features
12V SocketABS (Anti-lock Brake System)AirbagsAnti theft alarmAudio Controls on Steering WheelAUXBA (Brake Assist)CD PlayerCenter Arm RestCentral LockingCupholdersEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Electric Door MirrorsElectric SunroofFog Lamp - Front and RearFoldable Rear Seats with 60:40 SplitFront Seat ArmrestHalogen HeadlampsHigh Mount Stop LampImmobilizerISOFIX Child Seat AnchorsKeyless EntryLeather SeatsManual ACNumber of SpeakersOdometerParking SensorsPower SteeringPower Windows - Front and RearRadioRear CupholdersRear Window DefoggerSeat Adjustment - ManualTrip ComputerUrethane Steering WheelUSB PortWheel SizeWheels - Alloy
12V SocketABS (Anti-lock Brake System)AirbagsAnti theft alarmAppsAudio Controls on Steering WheelAuto Door LockAutomatic ACAUXBA (Brake Assist)BluetoothCD PlayerCenter Arm RestCentral LockingChrome Plated Radiator GrilleCruise ControlCruise Control Switch on SteeringCupholdersDaytime Running LightsDrive ComputerEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Electric Door MirrorsElectric SunroofFabric SeatsFog Lamp - Front and RearFoldable Rear SeatsFoldable Rear Seats with 60:40 SplitHalogen HeadlampsHigh Mount Stop LampHill AssistImmobilizerISOFIX Child Seat AnchorsKeyless EntryLeather SeatsLeather Steering WheelLED TaillightsManual ACManual Door MirrorsMap Reading LampsMP3Multi-Information DisplayNavigation SystemNumber of SpeakersOdometerParking SensorsPower OutletsPower SteeringPower Windows - Front and RearRadioRear AC VentsRear CameraRear Window DefoggerSeat Adjustment - ManualSeatbelt pretensionerSemi-LED TaillightsSteering Tilt AdjustmentTemperature DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen SizeTrip ComputerTrip MeterTyre Pressure Monitoring DisplayUSB PortVanity MirrorVehicle Stability Control (VSC)Welcome LightWheel SizeWheels - Alloy

Which one should you buy?

1

Best for Fuel Efficiency

The Peugeot 301 is the clear winner here, offering a more economical 6.6 L/100km compared to the Optra's 7.3 L/100km, ensuring lower running costs.

2

Best for Trunk Space

For those needing maximum cargo capacity, the Peugeot 301 excels with a substantial 506 liters of trunk space, significantly more than the Optra's 405 liters.

3

Best for Performance

The Peugeot 301 takes the lead with 115 hp and a quicker 0-100 km/h acceleration of 12.1 seconds, providing a more responsive and engaging drive than the Chevrolet Optra.

4

Best for City Driving

With its better fuel economy, lighter kerb weight of 1,115 kg, and agile handling, the Peugeot 301 is an ideal companion for navigating urban environments efficiently.

Pros & cons

Chevrolet Optra

Pros

  • Slightly larger fuel tank (54 L)
  • Longer overall body length (4.6 m)
  • Lower engine displacement (1,485 cc)

Cons

  • Less powerful engine (110 hp)
  • Slower acceleration (13.2 s)
  • Higher fuel consumption (7.3 L/100km)
  • Smaller trunk capacity (405 L)

Peugeot 301

Pros

  • More powerful engine (115 hp)
  • Quicker acceleration (12.1 s)
  • Superior fuel economy (6.6 L/100km)
  • Significantly larger trunk capacity (506 L)
  • Lighter kerb weight (1,115 kg)

Cons

  • Smaller fuel tank (50 L)
  • Shorter overall length (4.4 m)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which car is more fuel-efficient, the Chevrolet Optra or Peugeot 301?

The Peugeot 301 is notably more fuel-efficient, consuming 6.6 L/100km compared to the Chevrolet Optra's 7.3 L/100km. For daily commutes and long drives, the 301 will offer better fuel savings and lower running costs, making it the preferred choice for economy-minded drivers.

Is the Peugeot 301 or Chevrolet Optra better for trunk space?

The Peugeot 301 offers significantly more trunk space, boasting a substantial 506 liters compared to the Chevrolet Optra's 405 liters. If cargo capacity for groceries, luggage, or other items is a priority, the 301 is the superior choice for practicality.

Which car has better performance, the Chevrolet Optra or Peugeot 301?

The Peugeot 301 delivers better performance with 115 hp and a quicker 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 12.1 seconds. The Chevrolet Optra, with 110 hp and 13.2 seconds to 100 km/h, is less sprightly. For a more responsive and engaging drive, the Peugeot 301 is the clear winner.

How do the engine sizes compare between the Chevrolet Optra and Peugeot 301?

The Peugeot 301 features a slightly larger 1,587 cc engine, while the Chevrolet Optra comes with a 1,485 cc engine. Both are 4-cylinder petrol engines with automatic transmissions. The 301's slightly larger displacement contributes to its higher power output and quicker acceleration.

Which car offers a longer driving range on a full tank, the Optra or 301?

The Chevrolet Optra, with its 54-liter fuel tank, offers a slightly larger capacity than the Peugeot 301's 50-liter tank. However, the 301's superior fuel economy (6.6 L/100km vs 7.3 L/100km) means its real-world range might be comparable, or even better, despite the smaller tank.