
- Home
- Tools
- Compare cars
- Chevrolet Optra VS Nissan Sentra
Chevrolet Optra vs Nissan Sentra: Which Should You Buy in Egypt?
A complete comparison of the Chevrolet Optra VS Nissan Sentra — specs, prices, pros and cons, and live used listings across Egypt.


Nissan Sentra
From EGP 742,500
Chevrolet Optra VS Nissan Sentra: the verdict
| #1 Chevrolet Optra#1 | #2 Nissan Sentra#2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price Comparison | ||
| Starting at | — | 742,500 – 770,500 EGP |
| Engine & Power | ||
| Engine | 1,485 cc · 4 cyl | 1,598 cc · 4 cyl |
| Horsepower (bhp) | 110 hp | 113 hp |
| Torque (Nm) | 146 Nm | 154 Nm |
| Acceleration 0-100 Km/h (sec) | 13.2 s | 10.4 s |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | 170 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Fuel Economy (L/100 Km) | 7.3 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 52 L |
| Gears | 6 | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drive Type | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Measurements | ||
| L×W×H | 4.6 m × 1.7 m × 1.5 m | 4.6 m × 1.8 m × 1.5 m |
| Wheelbase (meters) | 2.6 m | 2.7 m |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1,220 kg | 1,205 kg |
| Trunk Capacity (liters) | 405 L | 510 L |
| Overview | ||
| Body Style | Sedan | Sedan |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Features | ||
| Key features | 12V SocketABS (Anti-lock Brake System)AirbagsAnti theft alarmAudio Controls on Steering WheelAUXBA (Brake Assist)CD PlayerCenter Arm RestCentral LockingCupholdersEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Electric Door MirrorsElectric SunroofFog Lamp - Front and RearFoldable Rear Seats with 60:40 SplitFront Seat ArmrestHalogen HeadlampsHigh Mount Stop LampImmobilizerISOFIX Child Seat AnchorsKeyless EntryLeather SeatsManual ACNumber of SpeakersOdometerParking SensorsPower SteeringPower Windows - Front and RearRadioRear CupholdersRear Window DefoggerSeat Adjustment - ManualTrip ComputerUrethane Steering WheelUSB PortWheel SizeWheels - Alloy | 12V SocketABS (Anti-lock Brake System)Acoustic HoodActive BonnetActive SteeringAirbagsAUXBA (Brake Assist)Bumper Side StepCD PlayerChrome Door HandlesChrome Exhaust PipesCollision DetectionCupholdersDifferential LockDrive ComputerEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Electric Door MirrorsFabric SeatsFire ExtinguisherFront Seat ArmrestGas Shock AbsorberHalogen HeadlampsHDMIImmobilizerKeyless EntryLED Fog LightsManual ACMap Reading LampsMP3Multi-Information DisplayNumber of SpeakersOBD (On-board Diagnostics)OdometerOff-Road DampersPedestrian airbagPower OutletsPower SteeringPower Windows - Front and RearRadioRear CupholdersRear Lcd screensRear Window DefoggerSeat Adjustment - ManualSpoilerSteering Tilt AdjustmentTemperature DisplayTiptronic GearsTrip ComputerTrip MeterVehicle Stability Control (VSC)Welcome LightWheel SizeWheels - SteelWinchWireless Headphones |
Which one should you buy?
Best for Performance & Driving
The Nissan Sentra wins here with its stronger 113 hp engine, quicker 10.4-second acceleration, and higher top speed, offering a more engaging driving experience than the Chevrolet Optra.
Best for Fuel Efficiency
For those prioritizing economy, the Nissan Sentra is the better choice, boasting an impressive 6.1 L/100km fuel consumption, significantly more efficient than the Chevrolet Optra's 7.3 L/100km.
Best for Cargo Space
Families and shoppers needing ample storage will find the Nissan Sentra superior, offering a generous 510 liters of trunk capacity, far more practical than the Chevrolet Optra's 405 liters.
Best for Overall Value
Despite the Chevrolet Optra's price being unavailable, the Nissan Sentra's combination of better performance, fuel economy, and interior space makes it the stronger contender for overall value, justifying its known price range.
Pros & cons
Chevrolet Optra
Pros
- Compact dimensions for city driving
- Familiar and established local presence
- Slightly larger fuel tank capacity (54 L)
Cons
- Noticeably slower acceleration
- Higher fuel consumption
- Smaller trunk capacity
- Lower horsepower output
Nissan Sentra
Pros
- Stronger engine performance (113 hp)
- Superior fuel efficiency (6.1 L/100km)
- Faster acceleration (10.4 seconds)
- Significantly larger trunk space (510 L)
- Wider body and longer wheelbase for more cabin comfort
Cons
- Slightly wider body (less nimble in tight city spaces)
- Slightly smaller fuel tank capacity









