
- Home
- Tools
- Compare cars
- Chevrolet Optra VS MG 5
Chevrolet Optra vs MG 5: Which Should You Buy in Egypt?
A complete comparison of the Chevrolet Optra VS MG 5 — specs, prices, pros and cons, and live used listings across Egypt.


MG 5
From EGP 720,000
Chevrolet Optra VS MG 5: the verdict
| #1 Chevrolet Optra#1 | #2 MG 5#2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price Comparison | ||
| Starting at | — | 650,000 – 720,000 EGP |
| Engine & Power | ||
| Engine | 1,485 cc · 4 cyl | 1,500 cc · 4 cyl |
| Horsepower (bhp) | 110 hp | 112 hp |
| Torque (Nm) | 146 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Acceleration 0-100 Km/h (sec) | 13.2 s | 10.2 s |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | 170 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Fuel Economy (L/100 Km) | 7.3 L/100km | 5.5 – 6.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |
| Gears | 6 | — |
| Transmission | Automatic | CVT |
| Drive Type | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Measurements | ||
| L×W×H | 4.6 m × 1.7 m × 1.5 m | 4.6 m × 1.8 m × 1.5 m |
| Wheelbase (meters) | 2.6 m | 2.7 m |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1,220 kg | 1,185 – 1,230 kg |
| Trunk Capacity (liters) | 405 L | 512 L |
| Overview | ||
| Body Style | Sedan | Sedan |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Features | ||
| Key features | 12V SocketABS (Anti-lock Brake System)AirbagsAnti theft alarmAudio Controls on Steering WheelAUXBA (Brake Assist)CD PlayerCenter Arm RestCentral LockingCupholdersEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Electric Door MirrorsElectric SunroofFog Lamp - Front and RearFoldable Rear Seats with 60:40 SplitFront Seat ArmrestHalogen HeadlampsHigh Mount Stop LampImmobilizerISOFIX Child Seat AnchorsKeyless EntryLeather SeatsManual ACNumber of SpeakersOdometerParking SensorsPower SteeringPower Windows - Front and RearRadioRear CupholdersRear Window DefoggerSeat Adjustment - ManualTrip ComputerUrethane Steering WheelUSB PortWheel SizeWheels - Alloy | 360-Degree Camera360-Degree CameraABS (Anti-lock Brake System)Acoustic HoodActive SteeringAirbagsAlloy PedalsAnti theft alarmAnti-theft Wheel BoltsAuto Door LockAuto HeadlampsAutomatic ACAUXBluetoothBody Colored GrilleCD PlayerCenter Arm RestCentral LockingChrome Door HandlesChrome Exhaust PipesClimate ControlCollision DetectionDifferential LockDisc BrakesEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Electric Door MirrorsElectric Opening and Closing of Luggage DoorFire ExtinguisherFirst Aid KitFog Lamps - Front OnlyGas Shock AbsorberHDMIHeadlampsHID HeadlightsHill AssistImmobilizerISOFIX Child Seat AnchorsLeather SeatsLED Fog LightsLED HeadlightsLegroomMP3MudguardMulti-Information DisplayMulti-Information Display SizeNight VisionOBD (On-board Diagnostics)Off-Road DampersParking SensorsPedestrian airbagPower MirrorsPower SeatsPower SteeringPower TailgatePower WindowsPower Windows - Front and RearPush Button StartRacing Or Bucket SeatsRear AC ControlsRear Audio ControlsRear CameraRear Lcd screensSingle Exhaust TipSpare WheelSpeed Sensitive Windshield WipersSpoilerSurround CameraTiptronic GearsUSB PortVariable Cylinder Management (VCM)Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)Wheel SizeWheels - AlloyWinchWireless HeadphonesWood Trim |
Which one should you buy?
Best for performance
The MG 5 wins for performance enthusiasts with its quicker 10.2-second acceleration and higher 180 km/h top speed, making it more responsive on Egyptian roads compared to the Chevrolet Optra.
Best for fuel efficiency
For those prioritizing lower running costs, the MG 5 is the better option, boasting an impressive fuel economy of 5.5 L/100km, which is notably more efficient than the Chevrolet Optra's 7.3 L/100km.
Best for cargo space
Families or individuals needing ample trunk space will find the MG 5 superior, offering a generous 512 liters of capacity, significantly more than the Chevrolet Optra's 405 liters.
Best for daily commuting
The MG 5 is ideal for daily commuting in Egypt due to its efficient CVT transmission and better fuel economy, ensuring a smoother and more economical ride than the Chevrolet Optra.
Pros & cons
Chevrolet Optra
Pros
- Larger 54 L fuel tank capacity
- Proven traditional automatic transmission
Cons
- Slower acceleration at 13.2s
- Less fuel efficient at 7.3 L/100km
- Smaller 405 L trunk capacity
- Lower 170 km/h top speed
MG 5
Pros
- Faster 10.2s acceleration
- Superior 5.5 L/100km fuel economy
- Significantly larger 512 L trunk capacity
- Higher 180 km/h top speed
- Longer 2.7 m wheelbase for potentially more interior room
Cons
- Smaller 45 L fuel tank capacity
- CVT transmission may not appeal to all drivers









