2026
See Chery Tiggo 4 for saleChery Tiggo 4
From EGP 910,000
Chery Tiggo 4 vs MG ZS: Which Should You Buy in Egypt?
A complete comparison of the Chery Tiggo 4 VS MG ZS — specs, prices, pros and cons, and live used listings across Egypt.
A complete comparison of the Chery Tiggo 4 VS MG ZS — specs, prices, pros and cons, and live used listings across Egypt.
From EGP 910,000
From EGP 0
| #1 Chery Tiggo 4#1 | #2 MG ZS#2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price Comparison | ||
| Starting at | 895,000 – 910,000 EGP | 0 EGP |
| Engine & Power | ||
| Engine | 1,500 cc · 4 cyl | 1,498 cc · 4 cyl |
| Horsepower (bhp) | 145 hp | 112 hp |
| Torque (Nm) | 210 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Acceleration 0-100 Km/h (sec) | — | 10.9 s |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | — | 170 km/h |
| Fuel Economy (L/100 Km) | — | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 48 L |
| Gears | 6 | 4 |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drive Type | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Measurements | ||
| L×W×H | 4.3 m × 1.8 m × 1.6 m | 4.3 m × 1.8 m × 1.6 m |
| Wheelbase (meters) | 2.6 m | 2.6 m |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1,405 kg | 1,258 kg |
| Trunk Capacity (liters) | 340 L | 448 L |
| Overview | ||
| Body Style | SUV Crossover | SUV Crossover |
| Seating Capacity | — | 5 seats |
| Doors | — | 5 doors |
| Features | ||
| Key features | ABS Anti-Lock Brake SystemAlloy RimsAUX InputBluetoothCD PlayerFog LightsKeyless EntryMP3 SupportPower LocksPower SteeringPower WindowsRadioSecurity SystemUSB Port | ABS Anti-Lock Brake SystemAir ConditioningAlloy RimsBluetoothClimate ControlCruise ControlFog LightsKeyless EntryLeather SeatsMP3 SupportParking SensorsPower LocksPower MirrorsPower SteeringPower WindowsPush Button StartRadioRear CameraSpoilerUSB Port |
The Chery Tiggo 4 wins here with its robust 145 hp engine and 210 Nm of torque, offering a significantly more engaging and responsive drive compared to the MG ZS.
The MG ZS is the clear choice for cargo, providing a generous 448 L of trunk capacity, which is substantially more than the Chery Tiggo 4's 340 L.
With a documented fuel economy of 5.8 L/100km, the MG ZS stands out for those prioritizing lower running costs, especially since the Tiggo 4's fuel efficiency figures are not available.
The Chery Tiggo 4 is better suited for longer trips due to its larger 57 L fuel tank, allowing for extended range between fill-ups compared to the MG ZS's 48 L tank.
