2026
See Chery Tiggo 4 for saleChery Tiggo 4
From EGP 910,000
Chery Tiggo 4 vs MG ZS: Which Should You Buy in Egypt?
A complete comparison of the Chery Tiggo 4 VS MG ZS — specs, prices, pros and cons, and live used listings across Egypt.
2026
See MG ZS for saleMG ZS
From EGP 0
Chery Tiggo 4 VS MG ZS: the verdict
The Chery Tiggo 4 emerges as the winner for drivers prioritizing a more dynamic and powerful driving experience, thanks to its superior engine output and advanced transmission. However, the MG ZS presents a compelling counter-argument for those who prioritize practicality and cargo space, along with a documented fuel efficiency that makes it a strong contender for value-conscious families.
| #1 Chery Tiggo 4#1 | #2 MG ZS#2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price Comparison | ||
| Starting at | 895,000 – 910,000 EGP | 0 EGP |
| Engine & Power | ||
| Engine | 1,500 cc · 4 cyl | 1,498 cc · 4 cyl |
| Horsepower (bhp) | 145 hp | 112 hp |
| Torque (Nm) | 210 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Acceleration 0-100 Km/h (sec) | — | 10.9 s |
| Top Speed (Km/h) | — | 170 km/h |
| Fuel Economy (L/100 Km) | — | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 48 L |
| Gears | 6 | 4 |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drive Type | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Measurements | ||
| L×W×H | 4.3 m × 1.8 m × 1.6 m | 4.3 m × 1.8 m × 1.6 m |
| Wheelbase (meters) | 2.6 m | 2.6 m |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1,405 kg | 1,258 kg |
| Trunk Capacity (liters) | 340 L | 448 L |
| Overview | ||
| Body Style | SUV Crossover | SUV Crossover |
| Seating Capacity | — | 5 seats |
| Doors | — | 5 doors |
| Features | ||
| Key features | ABS (Anti-lock Brake System)AirbagsAnti theft alarmAUXBA (Brake Assist)BluetoothCD PlayerCenter Arm RestCentral LockingEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Fabric SeatsFog Lamps - Front OnlyFoldable Rear Seats with 60:40 SplitHill AssistImmobilizerISOFIX Child Seat AnchorsKeyless EntryMP3Multi-Information DisplayPower SteeringPower Windows - Front and RearRadioRear LampsSeat Adjustment - ManualTraction ControlTyre Pressure Monitoring DisplayUSB PortVariable Cylinder Management (VCM)Wheel SizeWheels - Alloy | 12V SocketABS (Anti-lock Brake System)AirbagsAudio Controls on Steering WheelAutomatic ACBA (Brake Assist)BluetoothCargo Area LightCenter Arm RestCentral LockingCruise ControlCruise Control Switch on SteeringCupholdersDaytime Running LightsDrive ComputerEBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)Electric Door MirrorsFabric SeatsFog Lamp - Front and RearFog Lamp - Rear OnlyFoldable Rear Seats with 60:40 SplitFront Seat ArmrestHalogen HeadlampsHigh Mount Stop LampHill AssistImmobilizerISOFIX Child Seat AnchorsKeyless EntryLeather Gear Shift LeverLeather SeatsLeather Steering WheelManual ACMap Reading LampsMP3Multi-Information DisplayNumber of SpeakersOdometerParking SensorsPower OutletsPower SteeringPower Windows - Front and RearPush Button StartRadioRear CameraRear CupholdersRear Window DefoggerRear WiperRoof RailsRoof SpoilerSeat Adjustment - ManualSeatbelt pretensionerSteering Tilt AdjustmentTemperature DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen SizeTraction ControlTrip ComputerTrip MeterTyre Pressure Monitoring DisplayUSB PortVanity MirrorVehicle Stability Control (VSC)Welcome LightWheel SizeWheels - Alloy |
Which one should you buy?
1
Best for Performance Enthusiasts
The Chery Tiggo 4 wins here with its robust 145 hp engine and 210 Nm of torque, offering a significantly more engaging and responsive drive compared to the MG ZS.
2
Best for Cargo Space
The MG ZS is the clear choice for cargo, providing a generous 448 L of trunk capacity, which is substantially more than the Chery Tiggo 4's 340 L.
3
Best for Fuel Efficiency Seekers
With a documented fuel economy of 5.8 L/100km, the MG ZS stands out for those prioritizing lower running costs, especially since the Tiggo 4's fuel efficiency figures are not available.
4
Best for Longer Journeys
The Chery Tiggo 4 is better suited for longer trips due to its larger 57 L fuel tank, allowing for extended range between fill-ups compared to the MG ZS's 48 L tank.
Pros & cons
Chery Tiggo 4
Pros
- Significantly higher horsepower (145 hp)
- Stronger torque output (210 Nm)
- More advanced 6-speed automatic transmission
- Larger fuel tank capacity (57 L)
Cons
- Smaller trunk capacity (340 L)
- Fuel economy figures not available
- Acceleration and top speed figures not available
- Heavier kerb weight
MG ZS
Pros
- Superior trunk capacity (448 L)
- Documented good fuel economy (5.8 L/100km)
- Quicker acceleration time (10.9s)
- Lighter kerb weight (1,258 kg)
Cons
- Lower engine power (112 hp)
- Lower torque output (150 Nm)
- Fewer gears in transmission (4-speed automatic)
- Smaller fuel tank capacity (48 L)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Chery Tiggo 4 or MG ZS better for performance in Egypt?
The Chery Tiggo 4 is definitively better for performance. It offers a robust 145 hp engine with 210 Nm of torque, significantly outperforming the MG ZS's 112 hp and 150 Nm. If you prioritize a more dynamic and responsive driving experience, the Tiggo 4 is the stronger choice.
Which car has more cargo space, the Chery Tiggo 4 or MG ZS?
The MG ZS offers considerably more cargo space with a trunk capacity of 448 L, compared to the Chery Tiggo 4's 340 L. For shoppers needing ample room for luggage, groceries, or family essentials, the MG ZS is the clear winner.
Is the MG ZS more fuel-efficient than the Chery Tiggo 4?
Based on available data, the MG ZS is more fuel-efficient, with a documented consumption of 5.8 L/100km. The fuel economy figures for the Chery Tiggo 4 are not provided, making the MG ZS the safer bet for buyers prioritizing lower fuel costs.
What are the main differences in driving experience between the Chery Tiggo 4 and MG ZS?
The main difference lies in power and transmission. The Chery Tiggo 4 provides a more powerful engine (145 hp vs 112 hp) and a smoother 6-speed automatic, suggesting a more refined and energetic drive. The MG ZS, while lighter and having known acceleration, has less power and a 4-speed automatic, which might feel less responsive.
Which car is better for long-distance travel, Chery Tiggo 4 or MG ZS?
The Chery Tiggo 4 is slightly better for long-distance travel due to its larger 57 L fuel tank, which allows for a longer range between fill-ups compared to the MG ZS's 48 L tank. While the MG ZS has documented fuel efficiency, the Tiggo 4's larger tank offers more convenience on longer journeys.
